Accident Claims & Fatal Injuries
Personal Injury Claims
Serious Injury Rehabilitation, Treatment and Support
Criminal Injury Claims
Court of Protection
Estate Planning and Wills
Inheritance Tax Planning
Business Succession Planning
Estate Administration and Probate
Divorce and Family Law
Separation, Divorce, Dissolution of Civil Partnership
Financial Considerations in Separation, Divorce and Dissolution of Civil Partnership
Prenuptial, Postnuptial and Cohabitation Agreements
Sorry, we couldn’t find any results... Please try a different search term.
Our experienced legal specialists can advise you
Yes, the appointment of deputies is determined by the Court of Protection and the Court has the power to discharge or replace a deputy. There might be a number of different reasons why the Court considers that a change of deputy is in the person’s best interests, including cases where there has been a breakdown in the relationship with the deputy. This can extend to fractured relationships between the deputy and other people concerned with the incapacitated person’s affairs, such as family members or close friends.
There are many reasons why a change in deputy may be the best option, there may be a change of circumstances or the deputy may have chosen to retire. Other potential reasons may include:
Whatever the reason for the proposed change, the central issue that the court must consider is whether or not the change is in the incapacitated person’s best interests. This will often include a number of issues. A common justification for seeking a change is because the relationship between a person and their deputy has broken down.
Without a positive relationship, it can become impossible to communicate information effectively in order to ensure that a person’s best interests remain central to decision making. This can cause strained relations between the deputy and the person they act for, which can ultimately lead to a breakdown in the relationship.
Changing deputy requires an application to the Court of Protection and advice should be sought on the merits of any proposed application. Although it can be contested by the existing deputy, this should only happen where there are good reasons why it is in the person’s best interests for them to remain as deputy. The court should not be concerned with the interests of a deputy, and should only be concerned with the interests of the person who lacks capacity. An application to change deputy should also not be made lightly and ‘deputy shopping’ is strongly discouraged. The key point will be the determination of best interests of the person at the heart of the application.
The Court of Protection may be asked to exercise its powers in respect of a person’s property and financial affairs if they lack mental capacity to make decisions themselves.
The court can be asked to make a specific decision, or decisions. Alternatively, it may appoint a deputy to be the decision-maker on an ongoing basis. A deputy may be a friend or family member, it may be a local authority, it may be a professional (almost always a solicitor) or it may be a trust corporation. This article does not set out to describe the role of a deputy, or the scope of their decision-making powers, but instead to describe the processes and issues involved in changing a deputy.
The court is the only body that can decide who the deputy should be. This applies as much to the identity of a replacement deputy as it does to the deputy appointed in the first place. When making this decision – or indeed any decision about a person who lacks mental capacity – the court’s focus will be on what is in that person’s best interests. Best interests decision-making is central to the work both of the court, and of deputies.
When making any best interests decision, the court will consider the wishes and feelings of the person they are making the decision for. The court will also listen to the views of people who are involved in that person’s life, whether they are a family member, a friend, a carer or some other professional. It is important to bear in mind that the person’s wishes and feelings, and the views of other people, may not necessarily determine the answer to the question. This is as true about the identity of a deputy as it is about any other issue. The court is not required to appoint the deputy that the person would like, or that their family would like. In the same way, the court is not obliged to remove a deputy even if this is what the person, or their family might want to happen. The court must be persuaded that the appointment of a new deputy is in the person’s best interests.
In terms of the first appointment, if the proposed deputy is a willing and appropriate person (and if nobody objects), then it is usually a straightforward process of nominating a prospective deputy that the court will then appoint. The question may not be as clear cut when the court is asked to remove an existing deputy and to appoint somebody else in their place. Much will come down to the circumstances, and these will be different in every case.
There are many reasons why an application might be made to change a deputy. One of the most straightforward scenarios is one where a named, individual deputy no longer wishes to be the deputy, for whatever reason. Nobody can be forced to be a deputy; they must be willing. If a person wants to retire from deputyship, the court cannot stand in their way and will appoint a replacement. Another scenario – though one which is mercifully rare in professional deputyships – might be if there has been wrongdoing on the part of the deputy. This could take many forms, but generally comes down to the deputy not having acted in the person’s best interests, and/or having failed to keep to the strict recordkeeping and reporting obligations required of every deputy. A deputy’s failing may be stark and obvious, for example if they have misappropriated the person’s money. Again, in a scenario like this, one could expect that the court will be quick to discharge the deputy and appoint their replacement. Matters may not be quite so straightforward if facts are disputed, or if the application is made for a different reason.
An application to replace a deputy might be made if there has been a breakdown in the relationship between the deputy and person they act for, or between the deputy and that person’s family. For an application to succeed, there must be evidence not that the relationship has soured, but that it has broken down irretrievably. The court will expect all parties to make efforts to repair the relationship. The court will generally only entertain an application to replace a deputy on the grounds of irretrievable relationship breakdown if it is satisfied that there is no realistic prospect of the deputyship being brought back on track. In an application based on breakdown, the court will want to understand the nature of the breakdown, as well as what has been done to try to repair it. There could be one or more reasons underlying a failed, or failing relationship and again, each case turns on its own unique facts.
Disputes can often arise if a deputy has made decisions that the person they act for disagrees with, or that their family disagrees with. These are often the thorniest issues in a deputy replacement application. It is important to recognise that although deputies are required to explore their client’s wishes and feelings, and to seek the views of those closely connected with the person or the decision, the decision itself is for the deputy alone to take. Very often, deputies may make best interests decisions that their client, or others in the family disagree with. The court discourages – and will not support – what has become known as deputy shopping, where this means searching for a deputy who, it is hoped, will bend to pressure or accede to the wishes of a client or their family. In short, “ ‘I don’t like what is happening’” is usually not enough to discharge a deputy, unless there is also a valid criticism that could be made about decision making, or the deputy/deputyship generally. Equally though, there are cases where personalities have clashed, and the atmosphere has become so toxic that it is impossible for the deputyship to continue effectively. This could happen without there necessarily having been any wrongdoing on the deputy’s part. In those cases, the court could well be persuaded that it is in the person’s best interests for a fresh start to be made with a new deputy.
All deputies are supervised by the Office of the Public Guardian, or OPG. The OPG may well have an involvement in issues connected with a change of deputy, and this will certainly be the case if the OPG has received a complaint about a deputy, or expressions of concern about a deputy not acting in their client’s best interests.
Our lawyers have extensive experience of deputy appointment and deputy replacement applications, both where the applications are agreed, and where they are disputed. Some of our deputyship clients have come to us having reached the end of the line with a previous deputy. We also have extensive experience of acting for family members in disputed applications relating to their loved one’s deputyship.
If you would like to speak to one of our lawyers about an application to replace an existing deputy, please get in touch today on 03333 058375 or email to firstname.lastname@example.org. We are here to help you.
Partner, Court of Protection & Wealth Protection
Partner, Court of Protection
Associate, Court of Protection
Solicitor, Court of Protection
Administrator, Court of Protection
“Tom Young has been extremely helpful with case advice and a seemingly smooth transition of cases.” Legal 500
The team are dedicated, highly experienced, professional, and approachable, with a drive to ensure the best outcome for their clients.” Kate Barron, Clinical Case Manager
“I am currently a client of Sam Firth, I cannot recommend him enough, he is very thorough, professional and supportive, I can't imagine anyone else dealing with such a complex case, resulting in positive outcomes.” Stacey
“Tom Young is excellent. I cannot fault his continuous efforts and expertise enough. He offers great communication and always treats our family with the utmost courtesy and professionalism. I would highly recommend him to anyone. As a family we are forever grateful.” Mrs R
“Jade Price was recommended to me and I can see why. Jade has been very prompt and thorough throughout. I wholeheartedly feel at ease with Jade guiding me.” Mr P
∕ Court of Protection
Local Authority Training
Tom Young has extensive experience and expertise in managing complex deputyships, with a particular emphasis on clients who have received...
Deputy Report and Lay Deputy Assistance
As expert lawyers specialising in Court of Protection cases, we provide advice in respect of all types of Deputyship application. ...
We can assist in applying for a family member or friend to be appointed as a deputy on behalf of...
Gratuitous Care Payments
Court of Protection FAQs
Lay Deputy Applications
Professional Deputy Applications
If you would like to speak with one of our expert lawyers, just call or email using the information below, or complete this form.
"*" indicates required fields
A race against time?
What is the Court of Protection and what does it do?
Will Planning for Families with Disabled Children